Jesse Spears Interviews Global Filmmaker Wendy Morgan

Jesse Spears (pictured on the top right, smelling a buttercup) is one of my favorite artists. In addition to the blog she uses to document her endless creative output (Long Live Cartoon!) she also keeps a personal blog called Carnage Knockout, filled with sublime ephemera: snapshots of plants and pets, 911 calls, bubble wrap, and lists: like, “Things I Don’t Understand,” and “People I Want To Meet.” It was on Carnage Knockout that I first came across Wendy Morgan’s godly music video for the Gnarls Barkley song “Going On.”

Wendy Morgan is a Canadian commercial and music video director who’s made some great ad spots for Ikea, Girls Inc., and MTV Canada that are often bizarre or bemusing and occasionally even tackle the ungraspable nuances of Canadian national identity. Truthfully, Wendy’s MTV commercials are too good for MTV… though, who knows, maybe in topsy-turvy Canada, that sad vestige of a former pop culture powder-keg has managed to retain some semblance of watchability.

Regardless of MTV’s contemporary significance, its legacy lives on in cyberspace as the music video medium continues to thrive on a newly global scale– thanks in no small part to directors like Morgan. She’s crafted unaffected, imaginative videos for bands like The Unicorns and Dragonette– bands which don’t get any significant air time on the highly corporatized cable networks, but are now finding a home on the information superhighway.

I thought it would be fun to interview Wendy Morgan, but even more fun to let Jesse Spears do most of the work, since she loves the “Going On” video so much. Jesse came up with a bunch of questions, and I threw in a couple of my own, and we e-mailed them off to the jet-setting filmmaker, whose blog is replete with images from Jamaica, Barcelona, Italy and France. I’m enormously grateful to Wendy for humoring us by responding to this interview, and to Jesse for conducting it. I’ll pass things over to Ms. Spears for a proper introduction:

1. What was the crew like for the filming of the “Going On” video? Like, how big was the crew, and how long did it take and stuff.?

We shot for two days, prepped for probably five days, the crew was around 20 or so people I think, it felt pretty small in reality. The producer was Jannie McInnes of Revolver Films, the cinematographer was Max Goldman, who makes a ton of great videos, and I think he’s amazing.

2. How did you come up with the story of dancing Jamaican kids finding a portal to an alternate dimension?

Well, the original story that was written was: we do a musical-style approach with singing and dancing that takes place in Africa. But it made more sense to go to Jamaica, and I love dancehall style dancing, but you’ll notice there are no obvious Jamaican references or locations. I wanted it to be a nether world. The song sounded like dancing and celebration to me and lyrically, it talks about going on. I imagined the farthest you can possibly go is another dimension, so we’ll go there.

continue reading

3 comments | Interviews, Music, Video | posted on August 11, 2008 at 6:23 pm
Dr. Dog’s Scott McMicken on Trains, Tea and Time Travel

Emerging from an angsty, melancholy, Bright Eyes-heavy bout of introspection in my last year of high school, I had the good fortune of catching an intimate Dr. Dog show at one small venue in UC Davis’ myriad of coffee shops. Like a dark cloud parting to reveal the big bright shining sun, Dr. Dog guitar-plucked their way into my teenage soul that night, and has remained one of my favorite bands ever since. So when the chance came to do an interview with co-lead singer Scott McMicken for Mean magazine, I leapt at the opportunity.

After attending an awkward industry-only midday peformance in Hollywood, I met Scott in the parking lot of the Roosevelt Hotel and we spoke for a blissful hour and a half of matters great and small. The meat of that interview will be published in the upcoming August issue of Mean (along with my interviews of Six Feet Under creator Alan Ball, Towelhead star Summer Bishil, and my first sneaker column). In preparation of Dr. Dog’s amazing new album, Fate, which hits shelves tomorrow, my editor has given me permission to post some excerpts from the remainder of my rambling conversation with Scott McMicken here. Enjoy!

Download: “The Old Days” from the new album, Fate

Have you ever thought about creating a Dr. Dog musical?

That would be really awesome. We did this album, Psychedelic Swamp a long time ago, and we’ve always had dreams to make it a traveling piece of theater. There’s a real strong narrative throughout the album and it would be pretty easy and really fun to try and make it into a sort of low-budget theater production. But even a movie of that…

Is Psychedelic Swamp available anywhere? I’ve tried to find it before and haven’t had any luck.

No, it’s not. The problem is… we would have put it out already, but the concept on the album is that we didn’t make it, we got it in the mail. So the packaging is an envelope with our address on it. The idea is that we got it—this cassette tape—from this dude who used to live on earth, but escaped into this psychedelic parallel universe, as an effort to escape all the problems he was having on earth.

And when he got there, initially he was like, “Wow, this is awesome! Everything is so weird, and everything is upside down, with psychedelic aesthetics—nothing is predictable!” But over time, as he gained his frame of reference there, he realized that the same problems persist and there’s no real escape other than accepting and dealing with these issues that you have in your life. So he wants to make this album and send it back to earth to spread that message, like, “I’ve made this mistake, I thought I could escape but now I’m just trapped here. Everything’s the same.” And he appeals to us, saying, “Can you be the band that’s going to translate this music into modern American pop music, so that the message is understood?” He’s becoming so detached from reality the more he’s there, his ability to communicate and his way of going about representing information is becoming more and more garbled and detached and that’s why it sounds like a very psychedelic album.

The reason we haven’t put it out yet is because before we do that, I want to do what he’s asking us to do, which is to take all the music and re-record it as a live rock band with no psychedelic elements whatsoever. Very straightforward, immediate delivery, just like he wants it to be—a translation of his psychedelic mess. So when we do that, we’ll put ‘em both together and it’ll be like a double album.

Have you ever hopped a train?

No… I want to. My friends do that. I have a few friends who live that way, riding around on the rails, and there’s something about it that’s very romantic. The three people I know who do it, it’s not a big social thing—they’re not with a huge group of people. Most of the time they’re on their own, so it seems kinda cool. Dangerous—very dangerous. Probably very uncomfortable. In truth, I’ll probably never ever do that, but I certainly like the idea of that. All I can picture are horror stories of getting sucked under and your legs get chopped off.

continue reading

2 comments | Interviews, Music | posted on July 21, 2008 at 5:23 pm
Princeton

I took the Gold Line up to Pasadena last weekend to catch just-breaking indie pop band Princeton at the Make Music Pasadena festival. Princeton is the saccharine bittersweet endeavor of twin brothers Jesse Kivel and Matt Kivel, who, along with their childhood friend Ben Usen, sing songs about the Bloomsbury Group in a deliriously dreamy orchestral style that recalls John Cale and The Kinks. It’s Edwardian British high culture by way of folksy LA beach pop. The members of Princeton were kind enough to tell us a little about themselves (and their love of donuts) in the video above.

This is the first video I’ve edited in HD, with many more to come! Watch the compressed version above, or click here to watch the video in all of its High Definition glory over at Vimeo.


 
+ Princeton’s website
+ Purchase the Bloomsbury EP for just $3 at Amie Street

1 comment | Interviews, Music, Video | posted on June 25, 2008 at 11:05 am
Matthew Lock’s Unnerving Illustrations & Thoughts on the Apocalypse

Imagine a world of decaying summer camp cabins and foggy Icelandic canyons, where long-haired metal dudes fraternize at Renaissance Faires and gnomish road warriors in handmade robes attend their sisters’ Satanic school plays. Space aliens and homesick hobos litter post-apocalyptic burlesque houses where Slayer-loving ladies of the night dance with zebras and sport Cthulhu tattoos. This is Matthew Lock’s world– a dark daydream empire where Atreyu may have ended up in his teenage years, sick of peaceful flights on Falkor’s back, searching for something a little more dark, lonely, or nostalgic– a place both hilarious and unnerving.

It was his LiveJournal, Koalas in Love, that first sucked me in. Casually littered with some of the most mind-blowingly bizarre and quietly romantic found photography I’ve ever seen, Koalas in Love tells two stories. First, in his written words, Lock’s personal observations tell the story of a young man who’s mad as hell with the status quo, and overwhelmed by the nauseating widespread side effects of American capitalism. Second, through his found images as well as his own artwork, Lock spins a tale of what could be, using his keen aesthetic sensibilities to project his societal frustration into something altogether transcendent.

Lock’s brilliant notebook-style drawings and vividly saturated paintings have been hung on gallery walls from Portland to Sweden, printed on record covers, and bound into zines for über-cool art book publishers Nieves and Cederteg. A handful of his illustrations are currently on display at the Junc Gallery in Silver Lake for the “Chimera Fronteria” show, which continues through May 11th. The artist was kind enough to answer a bevy of inane questions about irony, Homer Simpson and the apocalypse.

Hobos and Homer Simpson seem to pop up frequently in your work. What fascinates you about homeless vagabonds and Matt Groening’s lethargic father figure?
I find hobos to be great drawing subjects because they can be such interesting and comical characters. I think that they represent finding pleasure in many of the simpler things or perhaps represent living outside the system. Of course, in real life, this often isn’t true– but that classic hobo with the bag on the stick slung over his shoulder, wandering throughout the country without any ties… it’s nice to fantasize about.

Homer Simpson is the quintessential American person in many ways. He is almost passionately ignorant, lazy, totally out of shape, and dependent on Duff’s and bad entertainment to keep his tiny mind busy. I sometimes feel surrounded by Homer Simpsons. I also think he looks funny.


Your work is at times instilled with a sense of social frustration that’s mirrored in your writings. What annoys you most in the world?
Well, I am frustrated with so much that I’m not even going to attempt to make even the most basic list. I think our world is fucked. I think our Western society is in decay, all religion is an illusion, our planet is dying and people are morons who don’t read books. That’s probably a good “fiery” short statement. I just don’t see how the current average human being can really rise above the filth to repair what’s left of our planet. Therefore, it’s frustrating to me. While I can make personal modifications in my own life, it doesn’t really impact or change anything.

It’s also staggering how many truths are really lies. The average person might buy a 99-cent jug of “orange juice” at the store and think they are being healthy. Of course, it’s only 10% juice and there’s high-fructose corn syrup in it, among other unnatural things. The most frustrating thing is that people think we live in some enlightened age and are on the threshold of greatness. If only that were true…

Describe your ideal post-apocalyptic scenario.
Unfortunately, it often seems that within my lifetime the world will witness some kind of horrible event. Ideally, I would like to be a traveling bard/warrior, riding an armored horse (with makeshift scrap armor). I would battle mutated survivors, religious cults and all elite bastards… infiltrating their underground bunker mansions and stealing their gold/water.


Describe your perfect woman.
Hmm… my perfect woman. I guess she would have to be fairly skinny, allergic to religion, not into making kids and intelligent. It would also be cool if she rode a motorcycle and had a bachelor’s degree in space science. Maybe if she could also like Judas Priest and be from another country (I could get citizenship!). Oh yeah… she can’t be clingy either.

I went to a Dimmu Borgir show in the O.C. recently (with about 500 teenagers), and it was possibly the worst live music experience of my life. I’m not entirely opposed to metal, in spite of my ordinarily soft-tempered musical inclinations– the aesthetic of vintage metal, for instance, is highly alluring. What aspects of metal do you identify with, and is there anything about it that you dislike?
Well for starters, Dimmy Borgir are like a bastardized WWE version of extreme metal, so I can only imagine how horrible it was to sit through their set. The crowd probably had the collective intelligence of a skunk, but I realize that they are kids… it’s slightly understandable.

Metal, to me, is more than music. It’s a spirit of rebellion and defiance, pride in self, connection to nature, questioning what you are told and general escapism. Perhaps you are empowered by beauty in life and “soft-tempered musical inclinations,” as you put it… so be it. If that’s what gives you an escape from reality and sense of personal strength, then listen away.


I am pretty much a loner type of guy. I spend a lot of time alone and metal really gives me a sense of confidence and self-empowerment. Metal also helps me to escape from reality and confront thoughts on death, the cosmos, the future of humanity and many topics pop music fails to address.

I guess my main problem with metal is people’s false perception of it. Equating it with stupidity, “cheesiness” and immaturity. I dislike a lot of the über-elitism that plagues metal. In certain cases it’s called for, but it can tend to be annoying. I mainly listen to a lot of old metal for the most part.

Who are your favorite artists and illustrators, and how has their work impacted your own aesthetic?
I like looking at art by Mark Delong, Ben Schumacher, Frederic Fleury, Justin B. Williams, Mehdi Hercberg and Jason McLean, to name a few. These particular artists that I have mentioned have really influenced me in becoming more loose, free and spur-of-the-moment in my drawing/painting. For such a long time, I was very restrained and so particular about even the smallest mistake. Over time I mentally overcame this problem, thanks in part to discovering some of these artists. I like how “fun” and imaginative these artists are. I also like some old dead people such as Pieter Bruegel and the American folk artist Mary Ann Willson.


What role does irony play in your work?
I think my work is ironic in the sense that it’s seemingly an escape from reality– by creating odd looking characters and situations– but at the same time, it embodies so much of our actual world and its many problems. I might draw some aliens at a bar, and this is not the least bit realistic. At the same time there might be cameras in the bar, a depressed hobo in the corner, trash all over the floor and peeling wallpaper. You see?

Are you working on any big projects at the moment? What can you tell us about the graphic novel you mentioned on your blog?
I’m always just working on little projects here and there. The one big thing I am going to be starting in the near future is a snowboard design for Monument Snowboards. The graphic novel is merely one of my wild dreams/on-and-off projects that may not ever see the light of day. I can’t really work on it in just any mood, and I often have other projects that have deadlines and stuff.

7 comments | Art, Interviews | posted on April 22, 2008 at 4:54 pm
Nima Nourizadeh’s Sincerely Fake Music Videos

British videomaker Nima Nourizadeh is happy to shatter your suspension of disbelief. Distorting music video conventions, Nourizadeh frames his colorfully compelling clips with a playful sense of self-awareness. “I’m interested in how videos are made— what’s outside the frame,” he says. “I find there’s something quite nice about letting people in on what’s really going on.” In a post-Laguna Beach world, where fortunes are made by manipulating audiences to believe that what’s fake is “reality,” Nourizadeh’s videos throw a spotlight on the cracks and crevices of MTV’s counterfeit glamour. Whether it’s revealing a disinterested film crew standing just outside the frame of a heartfelt ballad (Lily Allen’s “Littlest Things”) or deconstructing the illusory enchantment of green screen technology (Hot Chip’s “Over and Over”), Nourizadeh is fascinated with the filters of artifice that irrevocably separate a music video’s performance from its audience. “I don’t want to hide anything,” he says. “I’m very much into people connecting with me, and showing them the rougher side of the video.”

With a couple dozen videos under his belt, Nourizadeh regularly works with artists who straddle the ambiguous divide between subculture and mainstream, ranging from Aussie indie poppers Architecture in Helsinki to British grime-rapper Lady Sovereign. They’re the type of artists who once upon a time (in the ancient era before broadband Internet) would have struggled to find an audience—to say nothing of video play. MySpace and YouTube have opened up a world-wide stage for small-time musicians, and Nourizadeh’s jarringly unconventional videos reflect that sudden change in the status quo.


His clip for “A Cause Des Garcons” by Yelle—who gained immense popularity on MySpace—feels like a professional production of a silly childhood musical fantasy. Revealing a soundstage decked out in cartoony ‘80s set-design flair, the video shows Yelle’s hairdryer and moisturizer springing to life to show off their impressive dance moves and prepare the unassuming star for a fashion magazine cover shoot. It plays like something Yelle might have dreamed up while singing into a hairbrush before the Internet catapulted her into international superstardom.

It was a trifecta of tremendous videos that first clued me in on Nourizadeh’s brilliance: Chromeo’s retro-CGI polygon orgy, “Bonafide Lovin’,” Hot Chip’s schizofrenetic Bat-dance homage, “Ready for the Floor,” and finally, the unsettling Jodorowsky-inspired spectacle of Santogold’s “L.E.S. Artistes.” When I realized all three of these stunning videos were directed by someone who doesn’t (yet) have his own “Director’s Label” DVD, I had to find out more about him. I was lucky enough to catch Nourizadeh while he was in L.A. on one leg of a whirlwind transcontinental video-shooting tour, working on a Flight of the Concords video (“For the band, not the TV show,” he clarifies). He graciously took the time to explain how he ended up where he is.


“I actually studied fine arts,” says the director, of his academic roots at Central St. Martins. “So it was quite far away from what I’m doing now. I always sort of lent more towards a commercial style, and I remember my teachers telling me, ‘You’ll do really well in the commercial world,’ which was intended as a bit of a diss— but I remember thinking, ‘Cool. Brilliant.’”

Nourizadeh fell into the music video racket when his brother, a house music producer, asked him to cut together some footage he’d shot to match one of his tracks. “Doing music videos wasn’t ever what I intended to do,” he says, “but I felt like I could get some clues to directing. I could learn the craft a bit.” Establishing a video collective dubbed “The Imaginary Tennis Club” with two close friends, Nourizadeh got the ball rolling by approaching up-and-coming bands at their gigs to propose collaborations. “These days I find bands coming to me that share my aesthetic,” he says. “It’s a nice change of pace.”

After going solo in 2005 with the Tennis Club’s amicable disbanding, the director hit it big with the lovingly satirical green screen-themed clip for “Over and Over.” Like a magician who can’t resist explaining his tricks, Nourizadeh uses the video to demonstrate how easy it is to manipulate the viewer with simple special effects, rendering the cold reality of a blindingly green room both lyrical and hilarious— without dismissing the excitement and energy in Hot Chip’s tune. “Boasting great performances and tons of little jokes for the taking, this video is nearly as infectious as the song itself,” noted one not-easily-impressed Pitchfork writer when the clip was included in their “Top 25 Music Videos of 2006” list.


One of Nourizadeh’s greatest strengths as a filmmaker is his ability to translate personal concepts and preoccupations across a wide gamut of styles in videos created for a smorgasbord of incongruous artists, without ever distracting his audience from their music or veering into obnoxiously heavy-handed territory. He never falls out of sync with the artist’s style or their song, even when he’s busy juggling Jodorowsky homages with explorations into squib mechanics, using a legion of horrified hipsters expelling neon orange blood from their chests.

An avid collector of art books that reference film, fine art, and even computer-generated imagery, Nourizadeh garners much of his filmic inspiration from still photography. “Because it’s a pure moment that’s been captured—it’s just a still—you can really examine everything in it. I can look at why it’s been composed in that way, I can really consider the lighting. It gives you something that watching a film, or other videos, doesn’t.” Pressed to list some of his favorite photographers, however, the director explained that he tries not to become overly attached to the work of any individual artist. “I just look through random reference books,” he says, “and in some ways, I prefer not even knowing whose work it is—’cause that effects how I perceive their work. I can’t think of where exactly I get ideas from— I know it’s a combination of all these things that have accumulated over the years, on a completely subconscious level.”


For Chromeo’s “Bonafide Lovin’,” however, the video’s point of reference was crystal clear: “Dave 1 [Chromeo’s vocalist] was really into anything from the 80’s or early ‘90s— so we started going through a bunch of videos we liked from that time, and Dire Straits’ ‘Money for Nothing’ came up. And we both just suddenly went, ‘Fuck, that’s a really good video!’” Astonished by the visual similarities between the Laurel & Hardy-inspired CG characters in Dire Straits’ seminal video and the real-life appearances of Chromeo’s Dave 1 and P-Thugg, Nourizadeh quickly realized it was a match made in heaven, and set to work incorporating the song’s lyrics into his concept.

“For the actual animation of it, the hardest part was making sure the animators were really thinking that we don’t have today’s technology. Everything had to be made from a series of block shapes. If you wanted something that had a curve in it, it was about stepping blocks so it would appear to have a curve, rather than actually giving anything that rounded shape. In today’s standards, people are trying to make everything so photo-realistic. Everything’s gotta have a polish on it—but you don’t have to do it that way.”

I’d noticed a link between two of Nourizadeh’s videos and couldn’t resist inquiring about the deeper meaning of it all: “Ready for the Floor” and “L.E.S. Artistes” both feature the startling image of people being doused with buckets of paint thrown at them from off-camera. The director set the record straight on this strange coincidence: “With the Hot Chip one, it was a specific effect I was going for, and it turned out great,” he says. “With the Santogold video, it worked as well, because it fit with the concept of making a really gruesome scene. Dumping red paint over someone not only looks good, but it also looks quite graphic. And I knew I was going to get really great reactions from the girls, cause it was freezing that day. It was pretty authentic, I think, I how horrified they were.”

Mystery solved—just a jazzy visual effect coupled with a pinch of everyday cruelty. “I was actually thinking of doing it again, in the Concords video,” he says, laughing. “I thought, ‘That’d be pretty cool, if I had a signature bucket shot in every video.’ It’s good to be aware of what is good eye candy—what we actually enjoy looking at. And that’s one thing, copious liquids—people enjoy watching that. I’m just finding those things, over time… I’ve got one, so I’ve got to find a few more.”

With any luck, Nourizadeh will be able to pull out some of that eye candy in an aesthetically indulgent feature-length project sometime in the near future. “Doing videos is great, because it’s short, but it’s so intense. The amount you have to do is really such good preparation for making anything else,” says the filmmaker. “It’d be great if by the time I’m 35—I’ll give myself another five years—I’d have made a feature.” Let’s just hope Nourizadeh never stops coloring outside the lines.

3 comments | Art, Interviews, Video | posted on April 20, 2008 at 9:45 pm
Nikolay Saveliev’s Diplomatic Designs

Like Geoff McFetridge, Nikolay Saveliev is a graphic designer who plays in the astral sandbox of 1970s homage. But while McFetridge is content to revel in goofy California vibes inspired by high-school sketches and new-age children’s books, Saveliev’s work feels more like the woefully forgotten output of an unsettlingly avant-garde Ivy League minimalist with a soft-spot for the thinly-veiled formalism of sociopathic corporate art. And somehow, that’s incredibly fun. Saveliev is like Paul Rand’s misunderstood child prodigy, huddled over drafting paper until the wee hours of the morning, trying to add an enigmatic touch of hysterical beauty to a pamphlet about genital herpes.

His “Pop Matters” project, for instance, rehauls pop record sleeves from T.I., “Lil” Jon, Jessica Simpson, and a dozen others with the type of abstract precision you might expect from a text about Heidegger or Nuclear Physics. There’s something both hilarious and sublime about the gulf that Saveliev creates between the glitz and glamour of Kanye West and the scholarly sobriety of his restrained treatments. 140 copies of these faux-record sleeves were quietly slipped into various new and used record stores last year, in an art-prank that packed more punch than Banksy’s sorta-obvious and over-hyped Paris Hilton publicity stunt in 2006.

Just glancing at his stunningly beautiful RISD yearbook, or his program notes for a Michael Haneke retrospective film fest, you get the gut feeling that Saveliev actually cares about his audience. In the latter case, the designer circumvented the humdrum conventions of festival catalogues, forgoing the generic Kinko’s-stapled pamphlet. Instead, he crafted a set of separately sealed (spoiler alert!) pamphlets for each film in the program, lovingly presented inside a customized manila envelope. Relying entirely on his clever grasp of typeface and Haneke’s own striking images, Saveliev provided a unique, reverent supplement that no self-respecting cinéaste would leave under his or her seat at the end of a screening. That’s dedication.

Saveliev, who’s been garnering a lot of buzz on the internets lately, was gracious enough to answer a few questions. Read on to learn more about growing up in the shadow of a crumbling empire, the myths behind RISD, and the endless pleasures of Powerpoint-chic:

How long have you been designing, and what got you interested in the field?
My first paid design job was when I was 14, making computer game packaging for a small firm in Colorado; then I did some album covers, made piles of nice websites for things I liked, and created lots of kickdrum logos and band t-shirts. Nine years later, I’m still doing the same thing, but I get to work on a German fashion mag or a world bank in between kickdrums.

I’ve always had a lot of obscure interests, and doing design in service of those interests seemed like a good way to contribute and preach the gospel without directly partaking; it’s a sort of diplomacy, no? Essentially, I like to inform my friends about funny things.

Did you go to design school? What did you like/dislike like about your educational experience?
I went to RISD–the heavy emphasis on history, making meaningful decisions in service of content, an inherent skepticism of style, and encouragement of authorship were huge plusses for me. The myth plays RISD out as a sort of “great artist factory,” which it definitely isn’t, but there are always a few kids that do great things, and they usually feed off each other in the best ways possible.

What has the response been to your planted record sleeves for the “Pop Matters” project? Did anyone find the records and try to contact you?
Pop Matters was sort of a one-off that a friend of mine who worked at a local radio station saw; we brought it to his boss, and they gave us a little bit of money to seed them all over the Ocean State. The station got a few calls, which was great, but I never really got to find out exactly how much people liked them until they started getting blogged all over the place. I’m going to make another run of Pop Matters this year, but take all of the promotional content out and rewrite the insert; I’ll offer them up on my website for people to place in their own record collections.

What are your strongest sources of inspiration? Most unusual?
Well, I was born in Leningrad, Russia, and got a lot of my early childhood pop culture through a weird filter–the crumbling Iron Curtain. So I ended up thinking a lot of weird things were cool that would’ve probably never come to my attention had I had a regular All-American upbringing. But since I got to learn the English language from books, and culture from magazines, tapes, and records, & the Internet in this sort of immigrant-naïve way, I ended up with a pretty specific toolbox of tastes. I love folk-traditional culture and art, italo, industrial, new-wave, post-punk, and other 80s music flotsam, religious theories and sects, magical theories, hackers, bad cyberpunk novels, historical secrets, conspiracy theories, cold war geopolitics, and all sorts of other funny things. But on the other side, I just like pop music, being metal, and hanging out with my girlfriend. Regular populism mixed with serious obscurity works for me.

I like the idea of a consolidated aesthetic totality; what you make looks like what you listen to, sounds like what you wear, and speaks like what you believe in. In simpler terms, my girlfriend might look like she’s in a band I’d listen to, my haircut looks like it belongs in the chair I’m sitting in, and the work I’m designing might be written about in a book that I would read. Even my cat has to figure in there somehow. It’s a meticulous thing to maintain, but probably comes from the fact that I’ve discovered mostly everything through music, whether it’s ideologies, writers, artists, designers, cultures, subcultures, or other music. So it’s easy to tie things back into your work, as long as you keep your eyes and ears open, and maintain a healthy dose of critical thought.

I love what I can see of your zine, “The Dramatic Arc, Vol. I.” What’s the idea behind it, and are you planning future installments?
I’m putting a bunch of copies of Dramatic Arc together right now, so it should be up for grabs soon; it’s another case of me wanting to talk about things I love in a sort of obfuscated context. I took the lyrics from some of my favorite new-wave and post-punk staples, and holistically diagrammed them in this sort of ascetic Powerpoint-chic. The entire zine is filled with inside references to these bands and lyrics, which I hope some people might pick up on; ideally it’ll end up as an impetus for research–people might look up the lyrics, band histories, or simply listen to the songs. Hopefully, it’ll get a few people interested in some of this stuff, just because it’s in a new context; people who might have picked it up because, well, “hey, rad zine,” but ended up with a lot of hidden information and lots and lots of levels of content.

In Dramatic Arc Vol I., most of the songs’ content follows a classic dramatic arc. Future editions of the zine will play with other themes, but all will have a tie-in back into narrative structures. I’ll definitely never make a zine that’s just full of cool drawings; it’s gotta have a huge idealistic payload behind it.

Outside of straight graphic design, you’ve worked with photography, illustration, and even fashion. What direction do you see your work moving towards? Which mediums you would like to continue exploring?
I used to make music, which pretty much stopped getting finished while I was in college; I’m starting that up again with some friends, so hopefully I can get drunk and fall off a stage near you sometime soon again. Otherwise, I love working with other artforms, whether it’s writing or fashion or music; it’s a great way to see how other people sort of manifest their influences. Hopefully I can just keep making good work with people that I like, and keep learning while I’m doing it. I feel like I’ve just started.

14 comments | Art, Interviews | posted on April 7, 2008 at 11:45 am
Quiet Moments with Shirtless Men (In a Totally Not Homoerotic Way)

Mark Rubenstein is a 24-year-old Kentucky-born Brooklyn photographer who takes pictures of a shirtless men, doesn’t own a camera, and wants to express what it feels like to flourish into self-awareness. His ongoing project, Common Place, is a three-part series about introspection and coming of age. According to his artist’s statement: “…[Common Place] unfolds to tell the story of one’s own personal evolution: the coming of sentience (the quality or state of consciousness).”

His compositions are both quotidian and otherworldly, conveying an eerie sense of stillness and vulnerability. His passively posing models remind me of Gregory Crewdson’s frozen theatricality, minus the spooky and threatening nightscape that Crewdson’s characters inhabit. I wanted to know more about Rubenstein and his work, so I asked him a few questions:

Do you do commercial photography in addition to the personal work available on your site? If not, what sort of day job do you hold?

I do not do any commercial photography. I really believe in pursing my project and ones that I feel I can contribute too. I view myself more as an artist rather than a photographer– I don’t even own a camera. To support myself, I work a day job at the magazine Photo District News. I have worked there for many years, starting off as a intern, and I now have a full time position. Which is good, because I am constantly surrounded by photography.


The body of work available on your website is entirely comprised of pictures of shirtless men. Do you ever run into opposition because of this? Have you witnessed anyone become conspicuously uncomfortable with the homoerotic nature of your work?

I wouldn’t say “opposition,” but I do get put in the category of homoerotic work. Which is frustrating, because the work has nothing to do with it. I have dealt with this issue for many years. The reason the characters in my series are shirtless and in boxers is due the fact that I want my images to be very classical and iconic. The world in which my images take place is an alternate reality. I want viewers to not be able to tell what period or time it is. I feel clothes really date work. I want to show the subjects in my series as their full selves, so I stripped them of everything. Some people are uncomfortable when they see my work– the images are very disturbing and strange– I’m defiantly not shooting what’s popular in the younger photography world.

What was it like growing up in Kentucky? Is there anything you miss about the South now that you’re living in Brooklyn? How did growing up there impact your artistic process?

I know it seems like a crazy place: people think everyone from Kentucky rides a horse and eats fried chicken. But it actually was a great place to grow up. It has a wonderful music and art scene. My work was definitely a result of my childhood and growing up. I really miss the South: it has this energy to it. I basically spent my whole life there– I went to college in Savannah, Georgia, as well. Brooklyn in a way is like a small town, everyone has their neighborhood and hangs out there. The one thing I really miss is the ability to travel on my own and going on long drives in the country, which is something I would do all the time in Savannah.


Artists are constantly hustling to get their work in galleries and drum up good publicity. You wrote an article for PDNedu with a lot of good suggestions on how to self-promote, but are ever times when you feel uncomfortable trying to sell yourself that way? Where do you draw the line between spreading the word and pimping yourself out?

I feel you have to do everything and anything to promote yourself. Because getting your work out there is the only way you’re going to survive. You need to be able to profit off your work. As much as people believe in art as this very precious thing, it’s also a business as well. For me to be able to sell my work is a way for me to fund new shoots and support and keep myself going. This is something I’m still struggling to do. I mean, some people are really fortunate, where they don’t even need a website– galleries will seek them out, and they can just focus on their work. But for the majority of us, we have to do everything to show people our work and our vision. I think you draw the line by representing yourself in a positive manner and showing self-respect, and not going to shows and other functions and using other people just to profit for yourself.

What’s the concept behind your latest series, Once Was? Is it a work in progress, or are you working on a different series?

All my work is viewed like a book. Each image image is like a new chapter in the story. Once Was is a part of the Common Place mythology and world: it’s just a new chapter in the same series. And for the new chapter I really wanted to convey this sense of overwhelming power and energy. For the first time we can really see the characters transforming into something else. They are traveling through themselves and time in the middle of a metamorphosis. I wanted the new work to be extremely expressive. With all the images in the beginning of Common Place, the characters are in a very internalized state– they seem stunned or almost in shock– they don’t quite know what is going on in their world. Now, in Once Was, they are beginning to be absorbed and taken on a incredible journey.

1 comment | Art, Interviews, Photo | posted on March 14, 2008 at 5:48 pm
Christopher Schulz and His Subversively Simple Erotic Magazine, Pinups

Pinups is a minimalist porn rag. There are no punny headlines on its cover; no steamy advice columns, fluff interviews, or smutty cartoons to be found inside. Each wordless page of the magazine makes up one abstract fraction of a fragmented image. Readers (viewers?) have the implied choice of either appreciating Pinups as an objet d’art in its original form, or taking the pages out of their binding and reconstructing the original image as– you guessed it– a giant (5′8″ by 2′7″) pin-up.

It’s so deceptively simple at first glance that you probably won’t notice Pinups is a quiet revolution. For decades, there have been magazines celebrating the sex appeal of men outside the mainstream gay physical ideal, through sub-culture publications like Bear, 100% Beef, and most recently the ultra-hip Butt magazine. The idea of hirsute, chubby, or bearded men being attractive is nothing new– but Pinups is unique in presenting its subjects as plainly erotic, without the trappings that come along with qualifying them (or the magazine itself) as “bear,” or “leather,” or even “gay”.

Like the blown-up images on its pages, Pinups blows up the very idea of a centerfold, making the image’s simple declaration about its subject more important than the trivializing cultural politics of ordinary gay publications. The models are neither exoticized nor fetishized– there’s no Other-ness in sight. “This guy is hot,” is all Pinups seems to say, and that’s something rather new.


“I didn’t feel like I needed to [use labels],” says Christopher Schulz, the 26-year-old mind behind Pinups. “It’s for anybody who’s interested it–I wouldn’t want to limit it. It’s a pretty particular group of people who are interested it, and it is a gay magazine–but it’s only gay because I make it and I’m gay, and the people that are in it are gay, and most of the people who look at it are gay.”

Schulz has been publishing Pinups through a Brooklyn mom-and-pop print shop since April of last year. Currently preparing for the fifth issue’s release (March 9th), he has recently upgraded to a full-service zine publisher. He’s also mixing up the layout by throwing in bonus single-page photos between the abstract puzzle-piece pages. The origami-esque complexity and erotic content of Pinups stands in stark contrast to Schulz’s day job as graphic designer for the website of a children’s book publisher (recalling shades of my favorite Swedish porn-funkster/award-winning children’s artist, Tom Zacharias).

Schulz’s aesthetic is a carefully cultivated one: his Myspace page lists Fassbinder, Yoko Ono, and Dutch design firm Experimental Jetset as a few of his heroes. I thought there might be some connection between his work and the art-porn films of 70’s filmmaker Fred Halsted, but it turned out to be still photography and magazines from that decade that inspired him to create Pinups. “Like After Dark, which is not a porn– but it’s kind of a great magazine,” he told me. “It was out of New York in the 70s. There were articles about actors, and it was very gay–but it never really proclaimed to be gay.”

Peter Saville’s album covers are another important point of reference for Schulz– especially the immortal design for Joy Division’s Unknown Pleasures (which, he says, “doesn’t work as well on a t-shirt”). As much as he may appreciate Joy Division, however, Schulz had no desire to watch Anton Corbijn’s recent Ian Curtis biopic, Control. “I did not see that movie. I heard that he’s wearing American Apparel underwear in one scene, and that really upset me. That really pisses me off. Cause I go out of my way to eliminate those sort of references–obviously, the models that I use have certain piercings or tattoos that are sort of giveaways that it’s a contemporary photo, but come on… you’re doing a period-specific film that takes place in the late 70s–and you’re wearing American Apparel? Just not cool.”

It’s hard to argue that the formerly chic retro-influenced basics brand hasn’t become oversaturated to the point of self-parody. “The interesting thing is, I kind of like the aesthetic of American Apparel,” says Schulz, “Because the aesthetic of American Apparel is vintage– stripping it down, removing the label. But at the same time they’re kind of killing the original looks because what ends up happening is that people end up associating the look so strongly with American Apparel, you can’t wear anything like that without someone thinking you’re wearing American Apparel.”

We’re not just going off on fashion-related tangents here, I’m pretty sure. It all has to do with an important gray area in contemporary life: the space between feeling connected to a sub-cultural community and losing your identity within said community. It’s a fence that many of us attempt to straddle– whether it’s sharing discerning aesthetic and cultural tastes with like-minded young people and not falling into the trappings of the “hipster” label (for instance, by dressing like you work at American Apparel), or publishing a magazine that celebrates the hotness of naked husky dudes without being relocated to the conceptual gay (or bear) ghetto.

Pinups is “post-gay,” but not in the same way as twat pop singer Mika thinks he is. Mika uses similar arguments about the problems with labels to justify his cowardly closetedness. Mika is stuck in the ambiguous, needlessly deceptive 70’s world of After Dark. Pinups lifts cues from that world’s coy nonchalance, but transcends the undercurrent of fear that went along with it. Pinups comes from the world of Wong Kar Wai’s Happy Together and Fassbinder’s Fox and His Friends, where gayness is just one more detail in the bigger picture.

The magazine reflects a generational shift in gay history. Take, for instance, Schulz’s own coming out process: “I didn’t really come out,” he says. “I had all these things going on where I could just act naturally and not have to come out cause I feel like everyone just knew I was gay, and I just started talking about guys that were hot. There was never a moment of coming out– just like no one comes out when they’re straight. I went to an art high school, and I was around it a lot when I was younger. Some of my teachers were gay, and I never really had to struggle with those issues.” Clearly, not all adolescents have such an easy time coming to terms with their sexuality (a sad reality we’re reminded of by the tragic murder of 15-year-old Lawrence King), but for many kids today, coming out is easier than it ever has been. It’s a generation of anti-coming out narratives.

Being “post-gay” means living in that aforementioned gray area: fall too far on one side of the spectrum and risk losing yourself– fall on the other side and risk losing genuine connections to the past and other people. It’s like the struggle of finding a balance between sex columnist Dan Savage and AIDS activist Larry Kramer, who in his 2004 speech, “The Tragedy of Today’s Gays,” scolded:

You condemn your predecessors to nonexistence and flounder into a future that you seem unable to fashion into anything you can hold on to that gives you emotional sustenance. You refuse to be part of any community. But if you don’t have any community, you have no political strength. You are too busy denying and disassociating to know that. You do not seem able, it seems to me, to fashion your future. To discover what you want. You don’t even ask what you want. You don’t even ask what you need. Your needs are as mighty as needs always have been, but you don’t ask what they are, which amazes me.

Conversely, from a 2003 interview with Dan Savage:

There is no such thing as the gay community. The only people who yammer on about the gay community are the gay thought police. They believe that gay community means that we are under siege; we have to pretend to agree with each other and battle the heterosexuals. That is not the reality of the majority of gay people’s lives.

We’re regular people and we are not waiting for marching orders from the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force. The people who invariably go on about what their gay community thinks and how someone may make the gay community look bad are rainbow flag waving dumbasses who live in hermetically sealed little gay neighborhoods. They are really anachronisms and throwbacks to pre-Stonewall gay life where you lived on a sort of precipice. No gay people I know live that way anymore.

Pinups finds an uncompromising ideological balance in the simplicity of its signs and signals. It’s a genuine liberation. “I think [gay culture] still has importance,” says Schulz, “when people feel really connected. I don’t think community should be broken down… but at the same time, I don’t think that a magazine needs to necessarily say what it’s for, because I think that it’s fairly obvious. I like that there are gay magazines out there, and Pinups is one of them.” It’s as natural as that.

11 comments | Art, Interviews | posted on February 23, 2008 at 6:49 pm
Corndawg in the Hospital

Corndawg doesn't know what day it is.
He’s trying to figure out how much time remains until he’ll be released from his extended captivity, currently confined within the boundaries of one long, tired hospital corridor. A jaded hospital guard with slicked-back hair is leaning back in his chair, keeping a watchful eye on us to make sure we don’t help Corndawg escape. The place is air-tight– sealed on each end with heavy card-access-only doors, and filled in the middle with crumpled Doritos bags, goofy nurses dancing lurid, grotesque dances, and a pungent locker room odor.

“If you think about it, it really starts to drive you nuts,” says Corndawg. “I’ll just be lying in bed and thinking, ‘Why am I here? This is a place for sick people. This whole place was built to help sick people… but I’m not sick, and that’s why I’m here… wait, why am I here?’” Corndawg is here, in this cinder block Glendale medical center, because he’s participating in a medical research study for some giant pharmaceutical corporation, trying out a new cholesterol pill. He’s here because he’s trading his body for money in the name of medical research, and it doesn’t sound like such a bad idea. They give him one 5-milligram pill and then he stays under constant observation for nine days while they make detailed notes on the side effects. And then he walks out with $2,300 in his pocket.


Since 2004, Corny has completed eight of these studies– and it’s at least partially how he funds his free-wheeling lifestyle. He talks to my roommate Liz, who’s smuggled him in some fresh carrot juice from Yum Yum Donuts, about where the best places to visit in Portugal and Spain are. In the past year alone, Corndawg’s been back and forth across the U.S. (often traveling on motorcycle with little more than his laptop, guitar, and trusty airbrush gun), down to Argentina, and overseas to Spain, Germany, Italy, and the Czech Republic. “It provides a nice cushion for an artist’s life,” he says of his intermittent medical studies. “It’s nice to not have to hitchhike or hop trains, when you can say, ‘Oh, I have an extra thousand bucks– I’ll buy a plane ticket.’”

Aside from the stuffy sterile surroundings, the conditions of Corndawg’s nine-day imprisonment aren’t so bad. He has his laptop and cell phone and he’s been watching the second and third seasons of “Lost” in back-to-back marathon sessions. Once an hour he’s allowed a brief respite from the fluorescent lighting– a few moments of fresh air on a secluded hospital balcony. Corndawg recommends avoiding the longer studies, however. In an 18 day study he once partook in, the effects of confinement began to sink quickly. Without exercise and meaningful human interaction, he sunk into a deep depression and slept 12 hours a day (actually, I should have asked if those feelings might have been related to the medication they’d had him on).


“Lie as much as possible on your screening tests,” he says– it’s a surefire way to guarantee eligibility. “Just answer ‘no’ to every question: ‘Have you ever fainted?’ ‘Oh, never!’ and then play dumb if they confront you about it later.” He also warns against radioactive tracers. “Those stay in your system for 30 years.” Likewise, he mentions, it’s not a hot idea to undergo the spinal tap tests. A couple brazen girls on the floor are undergoing double spinal tap tests, which require them to lay completely still for 48 hours straight. “It’s gruesome. They got up today and they were just stumbling around, on the verge of passing out.” But, he notes, they’re getting paid $500 a day.

Over the course of our conversation, Corndawg draws alternate analogies for his medical trials: at times he calls them a prison, but the next minute they become a vacation: “Sometimes I’ll fly out to a distant city, planning my trip around a medical study, and it ends up paying for itself.” That seemingly contradictory coupling accesses the heart of capitalism– his studies are just another way of exchanging time and personal risk for wealth and freedom. Corndawg’s willingness to bring it to such romantic extremes is either valiant or ludicrous, but it seems to be working out pretty well for him.

Let Freedom Bling.

6 comments | Interviews, Life, Photo, Video | posted on January 31, 2008 at 1:03 am
Molly Landreth, Photographer of Queer Youth, Answers Some Questions

Embodiment” is a series of photos by Molly Landreth, 29-year-old resident of the Pacific Northwest (Seattle, to be specific), and one half of the photography team Landreth + Riffle. The photos in “Embodiment” are striking, beauitful portraits of young people from across the gamut of disparate sub-cultures within the LGBT community.

The series is appealing not only for its aesthetic radness, but for its honest, deeply personal portrayals of queer youth. Even within the gay media, representations of youth rarely step beyond comfortable stereotypes– the kind of safe, cardboard character roles that Landreth deftly avoids in her images. Landreth portrays real people in natural environments, each with their own irregularities, without resorting to the alienating sensationalism that is often used as a buffer between reality and cultural expectations.

The photographer was gracious enough to answer a few questions for Future Shipwreck, so read on to find out more about Molly Landreth and her work!

What motivated you to make “Embodiment”– was there anything specific that sparked your interest in capturing images of queer youth?

I’ve always sort of geeked out about anything or anyone that ruptures gender norms… so that is something that I think will always be a part of my work no matter what I do. I also think that there is just something so magical and cool about the queer community, young and old.

I think that often comes from really thinking about ones identity and place in the world, and then fighting for it. I don’t think that’s totally unique to queer life, which is why I think that there is a universal quality to these images… but I do think that for the queer community that there are more risks that go along with that fight and a real bravery that goes along with being visible about it. That’s why I think that creating these images is so interesting to me… and so important.

All images in this post are © Molly Landreth.

One of the great things about the series is how different the subjects are from each other, tied together only by their mutual queerness. How did you find such a diverse group of participants?

It really started by shooting friends, then friends of friends…but now the internet has become my main method of seeking people out. A lot of times it’s just from broad searches like “Queer Detroit,” “Queer Ohio,” that leads me to people. Other times I find people through social networks like Myspace.

I think that meeting people like this is an interesting (to me anyway) part of my project because I have heard from some of the older folks I’ve photographed that the internet is filling the shoes of the gay bar of years past… a place where you can seek-out like minded people and not feel so alone in the world. That’s what I tell myself anyway to not feel like such a stalker. Haha.

Sometimes the photos have an almost-candid feel, but they’re also clearly composed. How long do you spend preparing each shot, and how many different shots do you generally take for each subject?

I shoot about 6 sheet of film for each subject and it takes anywhere from 15 minutes to 2 hours… but normally I spend about 20 minutes just talking with the subjects and then we shoot for about an hour. It’s always a really natural progression of poses and people are always so open to push the boundaries a little bit, which is something I’ve learned as I’ve gone along. I was much more shy in the beginning.


Composing honest glimpses into these people’s lives that are also aesthetically captivating seems like a tricky balancing act. How do you work with your subjects to find that perfect image?

I think the most important thing is reading body language to make sure that the subject is feeling strong about how they’re representing themselves. If they’re not comfortable it’s really clear and I don’t shoot till its feels right.

Do you try to use available lighting, or do you mainly shoot with a lighting set-up and a camera assistant?

I use available light most of the time and sometimes I bounce a flash when it’s really dark. I’m trying to get better about using a flash because so often I have people scrambling around their houses bringing in more lamps! It’s kind of a nice icebreaker. I always shoot solo but sometimes I recruit for assistants along the way. Twice now I’ve had someone’s 10 year old cousin or camera shy girlfriend holding an umbrella over me while I shoot.


What are the advantages of shooting on a 4×5 camera? How do you feel about shooting digitally?

I shoot digital for other things and I love it… like for my collaborative work, but for this project I like the slowness of large format. I also think that it puts people at ease to work with a format that they’re unfamiliar with and as a result they have less inclination to put on their “camera face”.

“Embodiment” reads like an anthropological study of today’s queer youth. What have you discovered about over the course of the project that surprised you, or conversely, re-affirmed your ideas about what it means to be young and queer today?

What surprised me is the discrimination (or rather criticism) I sometimes see within the queer community, and it often involves “not being queer enough” or “being too queer”. Even though there is a reoccurring theme of people feeling very close to this term “Queer,” as well as the community as a whole… it still sometimes feels like I’ve placed myself in the middle of a huge high school with 100 different cliques.

I’ve noticed that race and age really play an important role as well when it comes to how people define them selves and how they feel defined by others. Right now I’m trying to expand my project, making the scope of age and geographic location much more broad so I can look closer at this dynamic and gather a broader diversity of stories and images. Oh yeah… I’ve started having subjects write statements about who they are, etc. They’ll be on the website soon!

5 comments | Art, Interviews, Photo | posted on December 22, 2007 at 10:32 am
Video Blog #6: My Name’s Bob Jones
Yesterday’s video from the iPhone release contained an all too brief interview with Bob Jones, a titillating 73-year-old actor we ran into at The Grove (he hangs out there on Fridays). He was mostly disinterested in the iPhone, but spoke at length about being an thespian, and his blossoming Youtube career. Here is a brief chapter in his amazing story.
More Bob Jones!

+ Bob’s Youtube Page
+ Say Anything - Wow, I Can Get Sexual Too
+ Nevermore - Final Product
+ From First to Last - Note to Self

Previously:

+ Video Blog #5: iPhone/Hollywood
+ Video Blog #4: Learning How to Break
+ A Musical Montage
+ Corndawg Sings & Reads
+ Video Blog #3: The Silver Lake Leather Festival
+ Video Blog #2: The Start of 2007
+ Video Blog #1: Thanksgiving Vacation

7 comments | Interviews, Video | posted on July 3, 2007 at 11:31 am
Video Blog #5: iPhone/Hollywood
My friend Andrew and I went to the iPhone release last Friday at the Grove. Amongst the mayhem, we ran into Xeni Jardin, Kevin Smith, a kooky old man named Bob Jones, and Macy Gray. Afterwards, we ended up on a sound stage where a bizarre cat food commercial was being filmed. Check it out! People with slower connections, please be patient– sorry about the large file size.
9 comments | Interviews, Los Angeles, Video | posted on July 2, 2007 at 2:14 pm